For brand owners, GS1 Sunrise readiness checklist affects product data, packaging artwork, printers, scanners, retail partners, and online information at the same time. The transition should be planned as a business and packaging programme rather than a barcode replacement.
This is a reader-focused implementation guide rather than a feature summary. It explains the business reason, workflow, user experience, common mistakes, and proof needed before scale. Recommended next step: Run a cross-functional readiness assessment.
Direct answer: GS1 Sunrise 2027 is the retail-industry goal for point-of-sale systems to become capable of reading and processing defined 2D barcodes with GS1 standards in addition to existing linear barcodes by the end of 2027.
Definition
GS1 Sunrise 2027 is the retail-industry goal for point-of-sale systems to become capable of reading and processing defined 2D barcodes with GS1 standards in addition to existing linear barcodes by the end of 2027.
Why GS1 Sunrise 2027 Readiness Matters
The 2D transition touches data syntax, artwork, print quality, retail scanners, consumer access, partner readiness, and the period in which old and new carriers coexist.
For brand owners, packaging teams, retail technology teams, and data owners, the decision affects a planned transition to multipurpose 2D barcodes without breaking existing retail and packaging workflows. The article also converts standards interest into consultation intent.
The standard is simple: the physical or digital event must lead to a clear interpretation and a named action. Otherwise the implementation is producing activity rather than control.
Where AIQR Fits
AIQR's role is broader than generating a QR image. The platform is intended to connect product identity with printing, traceability, authentication, warranty, loyalty, and analytics. For the topic in this article, the platform can be evaluated as an operating layer that can:
- create product, batch, or unit identities for QR Code with GS1 Digital Link workflows
- connect the data carrier to product information and business actions
- support serialized printing on existing packaging equipment where compatible
- prepare consumer verification and engagement journeys behind the same identity
- connect later traceability events and analytics to the product record
The implementation is credible only when the brand defines the rules and AIQR can execute, record, and report them. Technology should support accountable judgement rather than hide it.
Traditional Approach vs a Connected Workflow
| Area | Traditional or partial approach | Connected and governed approach |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Complete one technical or departmental task | Support the complete product and business decision |
| Identity context | May rely on a shared code, file, or summary record | Connects product, batch, unit, state, and event where required |
| Physical execution | Often assumed from a command or manual process | Uses defined printing, verification, reject, and reconciliation controls |
| User response | Generic or identical for every case | Changes according to product, market, role, state, or event context |
| Data ownership | Scattered across teams or vendor dashboards | Source and owner are defined for each important field |
| Exception handling | Resolved through email, spreadsheets, or memory | Uses named states, owners, severity, and closure records |
| Measurement | Counts activity | Measures completed actions, quality, risk, cost, and business outcome |
| Best fit | Simple, stable, low-risk requirement | A programme where a planned transition to multipurpose 2D barcodes without breaking existing retail and packaging workflows |
The Decision This Article Helps the Reader Make
The decision this article helps the reader make is to run a cross-functional readiness assessment. The following areas should be reviewed together:
Retail and scanner readiness
Not every retail environment upgrades at the same time. The transition plan should allow coexistence where trading partners still depend on linear barcodes.
Data syntax
GTIN, batch, expiry, and serial can be represented differently depending on the approved carrier and syntax.
Consumer access
QR Code with GS1 Digital Link can open online information on common smartphones, while operational scanning requirements may lead to another carrier choice.
Resolver and domain ownership
The organisation should control the long-term link structure and decide which information is returned for each user and context.
How the GS1 Sunrise 2027 Readiness Workflow Works
1. Define the decision and scope
Write one sentence that explains what GS1 Sunrise readiness checklist must improve. Name the product, line, market, user, and decision owner. Avoid broad statements such as 'digitise packaging' or 'improve visibility.'
2. Choose the approved carrier and syntax
Compare QR Code with GS1 Digital Link, Data Matrix with GS1 Digital Link, and GS1 DataMatrix according to retail, smartphone, operational, healthcare, space, and data requirements.
3. Identify trusted data owners
List every required field and the system or team that owns it. Typical examples include GTIN or SKU, batch, serial, expiry, market, printer job, warranty, partner, lifecycle status, and access rights.
4. Plan artwork, printing, and coexistence
Test the selected code in packaging artwork and confirm whether a linear barcode must remain during the retail transition period.
5. Plan exception states
Define what happens when data is missing, a code is unreadable, an identity is repeated, a partner submits conflicting events, access is denied, a network fails, or a product appears in an unexpected state.
6. Design the user and team response
Show packaging or retail-readiness team the information needed to complete the immediate task. Keep internal technical detail out of the customer experience unless it helps the user act safely.
7. Record evidence and ownership
Store the event, state, review, decision, and owner needed to explain what happened later. A useful audit record should support operations without collecting unnecessary personal data.
8. Measure, review, and scale
Compare the pilot with approved measures. Expand only after physical execution, data quality, user completion, support workload, and exception handling are stable.
Workflow Table
| Stage | Input | Output | Primary owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Define the decision and scope | Approved scope and available records | Write one sentence that explains what GS1 Sunrise readiness checklist must improve. | Business sponsor |
| Choose the approved carrier and syntax | Approved scope and available records | Compare QR Code with GS1 Digital Link, Data Matrix with GS1 Digital Link, and GS1 DataMatrix according to retail, smartphone, operational, healthcare, space, and data requirements. | Product and data |
| Identify trusted data owners | Approved scope and available records | List every required field and the system or team that owns it. | IT or standards owner |
| Plan artwork, printing, and coexistence | Approved scope and available records | Test the selected code in packaging artwork and confirm whether a linear barcode must remain during the retail transition period. | Packaging or operations |
| Plan exception states | Approved scope and available records | Define what happens when data is missing, a code is unreadable, an identity is repeated, a partner submits conflicting events, access is denied, a network fails, or a product appears in an unexpected state. | Quality and support |
| Design the user and team response | Approved scope and available records | Show packaging or retail-readiness team the information needed to complete the immediate task. | User-experience owner |
| Record evidence and ownership | Approved scope and available records | Store the event, state, review, decision, and owner needed to explain what happened later. | Governance owner |
| Measure, review, and scale | Approved scope and available records | Compare the pilot with approved measures. | Programme manager |
What Users Receive
Customers, partners, or field users should receive:
- information that matches the physical product or business event
- a clear explanation of recognised, repeated, invalid, blocked, recalled, or restricted states
- the next useful action, such as verification, warranty, service, traceability, reward, or support
- Arabic and English journeys where relevant
- a safe support route when the result cannot be resolved automatically
What Brands and Business Teams Receive
The organisation should receive information that helps a named team act. Useful outputs include:
- an identity, job, product, event, or participant record that can be traced to its source
- defined normal and exception states
- timestamps, market or site context, and lifecycle information at an appropriate level
- completion and quality measures linked to the intended outcome
- evidence for support, audit, recall, enforcement, partner, or commercial review
- exportable records that do not depend entirely on one dashboard
The outcome should support a planned transition to multipurpose 2D barcodes without breaking existing retail and packaging workflows. A large event count is not useful when no one knows what decision it should change.
Practical GCC Example
In this GCC example, a GCC brand preparing products for retail markets that are progressively enabling 2D barcode scanning at point of sale limits the initial scope to a retail product that currently carries a linear barcode and a separate consumer QR code and two markets: the UAE and Saudi Arabia. The team uses the topic 'GS1 Sunrise 2027 Readiness Checklist for Packaging and Retail Teams' to define how the first workflow should operate.
Before configuration, the team records the recommended next step: Run a cross-functional readiness assessment. It documents the product or job identity, required data, physical or partner process, user response, and owner for each exception. Arabic and English experiences are reviewed with the operational workflow so the packaging promise and the factory or digital response remain consistent.
The pilot includes normal cases and deliberate failures. The team tests missing records, repeated identities, network loss, invalid access, rejected packs, partner delays, or other exceptions relevant to the topic. Results are compared with production, distributor, warranty, customer-service, compliance, or finance records instead of being judged by activity count alone.
Only after the data, physical workflow, user response, and ownership are stable does the company add another line, partner, product, or country.
Common Implementation Mistakes
Starting with technology instead of the decision
The team selects a barcode, platform, gateway, or dashboard before agreeing on the product, reader, business question, and owner.
Using a generic product or market model
The workflow assumes that every SKU, line, partner, country, and user behaves the same way.
Ignoring the physical or partner process
The digital model looks complete, but packaging, printers, operators, distributors, service teams, or retailers cannot execute it reliably.
Treating one event as proof
A first scan, repeat scan, location, printer response, or missing event is context. It needs supporting evidence before a strong conclusion is made.
Collecting data without a response owner
The platform produces alerts and reports, but no team has a time limit, escalation rule, or closure code.
Using unsupported certainty in customer messages
The result says more than the evidence supports and creates legal, service, or trust risk.
Failing to test recovery and rework
Teams test the normal flow but not rejected packs, outages, corrections, duplicate attempts, partner delays, or access failures.
Expanding before the first workflow is stable
The organisation adds products, lines, countries, and integrations while data quality and operating ownership are still unclear.
What to Measure During a Pilot
| Metric | What it explains | Primary owner |
|---|---|---|
| Readability by environment | Successful reads on packaging, phones, scanners, and intended point-of-sale systems | Packaging and retail readiness |
| Completion rate | Percentage of records or users that reach the intended product, production, traceability, reward, or compliance action | Programme owner |
| Data accuracy | Percentage of checked records that match the physical product, job, partner, or source system | Data owner |
| Exception rate | Share of identities, events, jobs, scans, or claims entering an exception state | Operations or risk |
| Resolution time | Time from exception creation to reviewed and documented outcome | Case owner |
| User success | Whether the operator, customer, partner, or authority receives the answer needed without avoidable support | Experience owner |
| Business outcome | The approved result such as lower rework, better recall retrieval, improved warranty accuracy, reduced abuse, or qualified channel evidence | Executive sponsor |
The measurement plan should compare results by product, site, market, partner, and time period. A metric becomes useful only when the next decision is defined.
Proof and Citation Opportunities
To make this article more useful and more citable, AIQR can add:
- a real workflow diagram for gs1 sunrise 2027 readiness
- screenshots of normal and exception states with sensitive data removed
- a before-and-after process showing manual work, error points, and the connected workflow
- a small anonymised dataset with clear definitions and methodology
- a packaging, printer, partner, or customer test from a GCC environment
- an implementation checklist completed against a real product or line
- a case-study timeline showing the decision, pilot, correction, and scale outcome
- an example of the audit, recall, investigation, reward, or executive report produced
Glossary
GTIN
The Global Trade Item Number used to identify a trade item within the GS1 system.
GS1 Digital Link
A standardised method for expressing GS1 identifiers in a web-compatible format that can be encoded and connected to online information.
QR Code with GS1 Digital Link
A consumer-scannable QR code that uses GS1 Digital Link URI syntax and can also support business processes.
GS1 DataMatrix
A compact 2D barcode that uses GS1 element-string syntax and is widely used in operational and healthcare applications.
Application Identifier
A GS1 prefix that states what the following data represents, such as GTIN, batch, expiry, or serial.
Resolver
A service that receives a GS1 Digital Link identifier and returns the relevant information or link for a user or system.
Next step: Request a product identity consultation
FAQs
Is this mainly a software decision?
No. It depends on product or job identity, data ownership, physical or partner execution, user response, exception handling, and business ownership.
Does every product need a unique serial?
No. Product-level, batch-level, unit-level, case, pallet, participant, or event identity should be selected according to the decision.
Will linear barcodes disappear everywhere in 2027?
No. GS1 describes a gradual transition, and linear and 2D barcodes are expected to coexist while retail systems become capable of reading the approved 2D options.
Should the pilot include failure cases?
Yes. Recovery, rejection, rework, invalid data, repeated events, outages, access problems, and partner delays often determine whether the programme is production-ready.
Can one identity support several business journeys?
Yes. The same governed identity can support selected authentication, traceability, warranty, service, loyalty, compliance, and product-information experiences.
What is the best first pilot?
Select one product or job, one market or site, one primary user, and one measurable outcome. The pilot should test this next step: Run a cross-functional readiness assessment.
What should be reviewed before wider rollout?
Review physical execution, data accuracy, user completion, exception ownership, support workload, security, portability, total cost, and the approved business outcome.
Conclusion
GS1 Sunrise readiness checklist should reduce ambiguity rather than add another disconnected system. The physical or partner event, digital record, and business response need to agree.
For GCC brands and manufacturers, the strongest starting point is one product or job, one site or market, one primary user, and one measurable outcome. Recommended next step: Run a cross-functional readiness assessment. Once the workflow is stable, the same foundation can support broader authentication, traceability, compliance, loyalty, service, and executive reporting.
Related reading
- How to Design a GS1 Digital Link URL That Can Scale Across Products and Markets
- Data Carrier vs Product Data: What Manufacturers Need to Understand
- What Is a GS1 Digital Link Resolver and Why Does It Matter?
- How to Choose Between Consumer QR and Operational DataMatrix Codes
- What Is Connected Product Identity and How Does It Work?
Sources
- GS1, Why is the goal to transition to 2D barcodes by 2027?: https://support.gs1.org/support/solutions/articles/43000743505-why-is-the-goal-to-transition-to-2d-barcodes-by-2027-
- GS1, How long will the transition to 2D barcodes take?: https://support.gs1.org/support/solutions/articles/43000743506/
- GS1, Learn about 2D barcodes powered by GS1: https://www.gs1.org/standards/barcodes/2d
- GS1, GS1 Digital Link: https://www.gs1.org/standards/gs1-digital-link
- GS1, Difference between GS1 DataMatrix, Data Matrix with GS1 Digital Link and QR Code with GS1 Digital Link: https://support.gs1.org/support/solutions/articles/43000756000-what-is-the-difference-between-the-2d-barcode-options-gs1-datamatrix-data-matrix-with-gs1-digital-l